It could very well be that causality itself ceases to exist.
It should have a way to jettison the armor if the guy needs to get out. So, uhh, I guess my point is that speculating on the actual pre-Big Bang origins of the universe is really, really hard. So we end up with 2nd generation stars, 3rd gen stars etc and on a long enough time scale, all «fuel» in a galaxy is exhausted. Yeah.
But then again, how much evidence do black holes really leave? Nothing or? There are quite a number of observations which are not just consistent with the presence of black holes, but can only be explained by black holes.
Altho’ I am an atheist I do agree «that the most reasonable place to fit G-d into creation would be pre- Big Bang as the catalyst for the first event» or first cause of the Universe.Of course, this point of view long preceded Hawking! What I was referring to here, is inside the event horizon of a black hole, between the «centre» and the event horizon. In that event, moving/walking would still cost energy, but standing wouldn’t.
Related Discussions:Is the age of the universe the same in all frames?The age of the Universe versus The age of its componentsWhat evidence is there for the cosmological dark age?Age of Universe ?[solved]Reported Post – Dave LeeUniverse Age and Diameter/Speed of Light.Discrepancy between age and size universe?Age and IQParticles and the age of the universePhoton age Originally Posted by Always.Asking So whats my point, If we lived in a universe of just black holes, and one really large one went «supernova» in a big bang type event, would we see the evidence that we see today. Leer más